G Scale Model Train Forum banner
Cancel
Create thread New Forums

Aristocraft locomotive upgrades

Jump to Latest
1 - 20 of 41 Posts
N

nickco201

· Registered
Joined
·
25 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
I am thinking of shifting my focus in large scale from narrow gauge to standard. My favorite road is the Southern and I model it a lot in HO. I am also building a 7.5in gauge live steam Southern Ps-4. So it seems that Aristo has a lot of SRR stuff. I was thinking of looking at their 2-8-2,4-6-2, 2-8-8-2 and the new 2-8-0. I would really like to superdetail these to resemble SRR prototypes. I was thinking of using trackside detail, and Ozark miniatues parts for this any other ideas? I was actually thinking of converting the 2-8-2 and 4-6-2 to baker valve gear and the 2-8-0 to southern valve gear. Is there a sources for commonwealth tender trucks ?. I really love DCC in HO and the tsunami sound system is amazing. Would it be a bad idea to try to run DCC out side ? Normally ive been just using a DC with a wireless throttle.
Also as far as rolling stock goes. Would it be smart to upgrade the aristo passenger and freight car trucks to ball bearing? what about the couplers? Should they also be upgraded.If so I was thinking of body mounted kadee couplers, but not sure where to get proper roller bearing trucks.

I realize I am asking a ton of seperate questions but thought it would be easier this way instead of making 10 sperate topics...
Thanks
 
#2 ·
Nickco,

Do a search of the archives on the Product Review forum. Lots of comments there.

Keep your doors open. The train world is a lot bigger than Aristo and there are other suppliers out there as well.

Regards,

GG
 
Discussion starter · #3 ·
Oh I certainly agree that there are a lot more suppliers out there. There stuff just seems to fit what I am looking for. I would love it if Accucraft came out with a some brass Southern stuff or even a generic USRA heavy 4-6-2 or 2-8-2. In 7.5 inch gauge its amazing how many companies there are of course most are very small but I would imagine Ive ordered parts from 20 different companies for my Ps-4 so far.
 
#4 ·
The hard part is that the suppliers of detail parts tend to produce 1:20 or 1:24 parts only--too big for 1:29. I haven't found any suppliers of 1:32 parts either, at least not with the variety that Ozark and trackside do in 1:20 or 1:24. So you have to make a lot of parts, or cannibalize other models. When I tried to make a couple Pennsy locos I had to make my own parts out of whatever


Lots of people run DCC outside. I do it, but via wireless using Airwire
 
 
#6 ·
One other thing to keep in mind is, NONE of those locomotives are currently in production in the Southern or any other roadname. The 2-8-0 is the only one even on the horizon. You may find a dealer with old stock, but none of them are in stock or in production at the manufacturer. That is one of the things you have to deal with in large scale, items may only be produced once or at best infrequently/

George
 
#8 ·
Lownote,

I was told not to use the G Wire under track power, but you do? It doesn't affect the G Wire?

Nate

Nicko201,

Try USA Trains, they have some current Southern stuff like a GP38 and you should be able to find a Southern RS-3 and E-8 from Aristo.
 
#9 ·
Nate:


I do it all the time--with five different locos, three from aristo and two with Bachmann drives. 21 volts on the track, Gwire receiver in each loco. It's been completely reliable and worked very well.

It's more expensive in the long run than DCC through the track, and I keep thinking at some point I'll go to DCC through the rails. But this method has been very reliable and I keep thnking "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."




Nicko: I've had good luck finding unpainted aristo locos and redoing them--there are good sources for lettering. But finding premade detail parts has been a bit of a challenge.This Reading RS-3 was made from an undecorated Aristo model. I added a few homemade bits and managed to find a set of diesel horns that were a reasonable size


Image
\

This USAT undeco 44 tonner made a decent model of the 44 tonners used by the W&OD, a local RR now defunct


Image


I'm not a skilled kitbasher, and when I tried to make a PRR B6 switcher out of a Bachman "Annie" I had a very hard time with detail parts
Image


The airpump on the side was made out of bits of brass tubing, the bell out of parts from Bachmann, the generator (not intsalled in this photo) was the smallest ones Ozark made and not really right

I've been wondering for a long time why the market for detail parts is all in the larger scales. It may just be that 1:29, not being the correct scale, tends not to attract modelers
 
#10 ·
Posted By nickco201 on 05/25/2009 6:27 PM
Would it be a bad idea to try to run DCC out side ? Normally ive been just using a DC with a wireless throttle.
Also as far as rolling stock goes. Would it be smart to upgrade the aristo passenger and freight car trucks to ball bearing? what about the couplers? Should they also be upgraded.If so I was thinking of body mounted kadee couplers, but not sure where to get proper roller bearing trucks.

I realize I am asking a ton of seperate questions but thought it would be easier this way instead of making 10 sperate topics...
Thanks




I just added ball bearings to a bunch of Aristo rolling stock. I bought some appropriate sized bearings online and installed them in the sideframes. I can't see any improvement at all, to be honest--the sideframes come with a delrin bushing that's already very slippery and I could not see any improvement from adding the bearings. I also have a few with roller bearigng trucks and while they look good there again I don't see much difference in rolling resistance. Maybe it would be different with ball bearing wheels. BB wheels are very expensive

Couplers--I like the Aristo couplers and they have worked well for me. But I'm not looking for prototypical fidelity--they are too big and they tend to space the cars far apart. They are easy to use and kids can work them (we have a lot of kids visiting our railway) and they have been very reliable for me, running trains of usually around 10-12 cars. Other people here are less enthusiastic about reliability and will say "just go to Kadees and get it over with."



There are a number of people here who swear by DCC outside. Most of them use stainless steel track. My layout is about half stainless steel and I'm not sure the difference is worth the price. I use DCC but over the air, via wireless.
 
#12 ·
Yep, DCC outdoors works fine, there are still some old wives tales that came from the early days of DCC. When I started 9 years ago, I was told it was impossible.

I agree on the ball bearings, they CAN help with lowering rolling resistance, but I have seen little improvement with plastic sideframes. They seem to help most on a completely level layout where you are not "lifting" the cars up and down grades. Ball bearings can only help overcome rolling resistance, not the laws of gravity or potential energy.

But on curves, often they are no help. If you use ball bearings on the ends of the axles, the wheels are still "locked" together, and you do not get any "differential action" between the wheels (like a car).

If you have the independent ball bearings (in the wheel hubs), often the extra resistance to get one turning faster than the other (if you have sealed bearings) cancels out any advantage.

Lastly if you have independent ball bearings (in the wheel hubs), you usually get some grit or corrosion that does the same thing.

Like Mike (lownote), I found that properly lubricated axles in plastic sideframes work pretty well.

Regards, Greg

p.s. Even though you have been warned that the road names/paint schemes are out of production, I'm guessing you are easily capable of painting and decaling.
Image
You might also find used Aristo equipment in the proper road name.
 
#13 ·
Gents,

It is early in the AM and a lightbulb just went off while reading this thread and so the question:

Lownote: Airwire "signals" over the air on a 21 Volt DC constant track supply. Question is for all to challenge: Would this approach to DCC be compatible with DCS with the "Signals" over the track on a 21 Volt DC constant track supply???????????? Keep in mind that DCS is able to work with either both AC or DC constant power to the track. The method of getting the signals to the loco is what makes the difference ....

ummmm, good question yes? Or no????

gg

Image
 
#16 ·
That's on the lines of what I thought when lownote said he uses track power with Airwire. first, i was told not to do that, but then i couldn't figure why when the only difference between track and battery power is where the power is coming from......
 
#17 ·
The QSI/AirWire setup should ignore any "commands" coming from the rails when the "Gwire" receiver is enabled.

If you are using DC for your DCS system, the signal "rides" on the DC. There's a good chance it would be ignored by the QSI setup.

The only way to find out is try it. I have never seen the specification of the amplitude of the DCS signal, but it has to be at least a couple of volts or it would not work.

You might get some speed variation on the QSI, but it might work.

Regards, Greg
 
#18 ·
Posted By Greg Elmassian on 05/26/2009 11:01 AM
The QSI/AirWire setup should ignore any "commands" coming from the rails when the "Gwire" receiver is enabled.

If you are using DC for your DCS system, the signal "rides" on the DC. There's a good chance it would be ignored by the QSI setup.

The only way to find out is try it. I have never seen the specification of the amplitude of the DCS signal, but it has to be at least a couple of volts or it would not work.

You might get some speed variation on the QSI, but it might work.

Regards, Greg






Well Greg, looks like my quest for a DCC system to compliment my existing DCS system has just been narrowed down to QSI and ??? . Worse come to worse, I would still use QSI on the isolated inner track and reserve the DCS for the mainline. If it did work, then I could work both on the same power grid and have a bit more flexibility here.

gg
 
#19 ·
And with a disable switch on the Gwire board, you could switch over to track powered DCC as a further option. I think you might be able to use the AirWire receiver in this way also. I have not come across anyone who has done this yet, so you may have to be the "beta tester" !

Regards, Greg
 
1 - 20 of 41 Posts
About this Discussion
40 Replies
12 Participants
Last post:
aceinspp
G Scale Model Train Forum
posts
460K
members
32K
Since
2007
A forum community dedicated to G scale model train owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about collections, displays, models, styles, scales, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
Live Steam General G Scale Discussions Beginner's Forum Model Making Track, Trestles, Bridges and Roadbed