G Scale Model Train Forum banner
1 - 7 of 7 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
23 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I would like to construct some narrow guage flats (DRGW 6000 series). What I would like to know was the decking ship lap, tougue & groove, or butt edged. I have seen looks of pictures but can't see that detail. Thanks Dave Cozzens
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,075 Posts
Hi,

You mean the 'straight timber solebar'  style D&RG flats of  20 ton capacity, 30 ft long, and built from 1887?


Robert Sloan's book shows them to have normal planks no shiplap or such; there are both photos and drawings of them.  I think that will be to allow the rain/snow to drain through the small gaps between the planks.


Wayne Spence did a very comprehensive 3 part series (including  better drawings)  on the D&RGW 6000 series flatcars - it is at the following link http://archive.mylargescale.com/articles/articles
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,271 Posts
Hi Dave,
First, welcome to the MLS gang.
For my freelance flats, I have shiplapped decking using 1.20 3x8 stock available from Ozark Miniatures. I did it in the milling machine, with some loss due to spliting or flexing. Having seen your fine miniature woodworking, I would like to know the technique you plan to use. Would you really consider making tongue&groove in 1.29, if that's what the prototype was? Expect that you just might!

Larry
 

· Registered
Joined
·
23 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
Thanks for the replies to my question. I have received replies on other forums as well and right now it is a tossup between shiplap and butt edged. Box cars, stock cars, gons, and idler flats were shiplap from the pictures I've seen. The picture Bruce included appears to be a class 28 idler flat which was rebuilt from cut down box and stock cars. BTW, I should mention that this is for a 2 1/2" scale car (6' long) that I will be building for a friend's live steam railroad. So I am trying to make it just as the prototype. I wasn't sure if anyone had a Hartford kit that might be as the prototype? Thanks so much and if there are any other thoughts I appreciate them. David Cozzens
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top