G Scale Model Train Forum banner
41 - 60 of 115 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
194 Posts
Posted By Steve Stockham on 09/03/2008 8:31 PM
Dave Goodson is THE expert


What else is there to say? If I ever buy another Bachmann locomotive, the first thing I will do is rip out that socket. The liklyhood of me getting another Bachmann is slim, since I am going to spend my money on a worthless socket that I am going to throw out anyway. Yes, Bachmann does make great locomotives, I have a Consolidation and a Shay. Both are great locomotives, and they have never failed me. But they are too expensive to just throw away half of the locomotive /DesktopModules/NTForums/themes/mls/emoticons/angry.gif" border=0>. If I am going to spend $700 on a K-27, I would much rather spend it on an LGB locomotive, that would actually work right out of the box. If anyone is interested, I might be able to have a real train run over one of those sockets /DesktopModules/NTForums/themes/mls/emoticons/w00t.gif"
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
2,615 Posts
Don't worry Josh.

Catch him out with one load of BS the story can and will change faster than your head can spin to another slightly different load of old cobblers.

That is why we love Stanley so much, and why I have kept a record of every of bit of correspondence he has ever sent me. Some of it is very illuminating.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
29 Posts
This is a fascinating discussion for me since I'm planning on buying one at the 2008 NNGC this next week. (there are no hobby shops within 3.5 hours of my home). I've often harassed Bachmann for their choice of prototype (and occasional quality issues), but I think the K-27 is a benchmark in 1:20.3, especially considering it's excellent price and prototype-specific detail.

Having said that, and recognizing that we large-scale modellers are a diverse group, I do find it hard to imagine that anyone would want to the the K-27 at twice the prototypes maximum speed (that's 43 real feet in 10 seconds - 5280 feet/minute divided by the scale of 20.3 scale/the divided by 6 to convert from minute to 10 seconds). I would *much* rather have good control and range at slower speeds then run a loco 2 times what the prototype ran at. And I suspect that I'm not alone in this belief. Stan Ames said it's hard to guess what max speeds the modelling public wants (again remembering how diverse we are). But I think the prototype itself offers some basis to make that decision - a 1:32 F or E unit should be able to operate at some decent scale speeds. Not so much for a 1:20.3 NG steam locomotive.

BTW - I'm not arguing with Stan Ames in any way - he's not the guy who made the decision. Just giving my 2 cents, if it's worth even that.... :)

Greg Coit
Arcata, CA
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,643 Posts
Posted By gregcoit on 09/03/2008 11:48 PM
Stan Ames said it's hard to guess what max speeds the modelling public wants (again remembering how diverse we are). But I think the prototype itself offers some basis to make that decision - a 1:32 F or E unit should be able to operate at some decent scale speeds. Not so much for a 1:20.3 NG steam locomotive.
BTW - I'm not arguing with Stan Ames in any way - he's not the guy who made the decision. Just giving my 2 cents, if it's worth even that.... :)" border=0>
Greg Coit
Arcata, CA




How do you know he didn't?
You might just be amazed at what may or may not have been claimed at one time or another, what's in print, and what the truth really is.
Nobody wants to argue with Stanley.
It's pointless.
Just be very careful to understand what you THINK he says in a response.
 

· Senior JOAT
Joined
·
781 Posts
Stanley said "in the opinion of most its[sic] way to[sic] slow for the mass market".

There's a mass market for the K-27? Really?

And they want it to go 60 scale miles per hour? On their 8' diameter track? Can it really do that?

I model in 1:20, and the fastest I've ever got my trains to go was 34 scale miles per hour. I really didn't feel comfortable with them at that speed, and I have 15' diameter curves. Typically, I run in the 12-18 scale mph range. Sometimes slower.

Perhaps I don't hang out with the "mass market" crowd, but no one I know likes to run that fast. We like prototypical slow starts and slow speeds. Slow speed performance is extremely important to me. A high top end speed is meaningless.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
52 Posts
Discussion Starter · #49 ·
Wow, Guys!!!! I had no idea what sort of controversy (ies) I would unleash by my inquiries. /DesktopModules/NTForums/themes/mls/emoticons/crazy.gif I'm the newbie that innocently started this thread. /DesktopModules/NTForums/themes/mls/emoticons/doze.gif I do very much appreciate all the positive input and will go forward with my currently unsatisfied lust for the K-27, but with all the caveats you guys have so helpfully provided.....motor gear ratio notwithstanding. I will operate at the lower speeds and, apparently, in DCC some of the other issues will be minimized. I will be buying next spring and, hopefully, by then some of the major outstanding issues will have been solved by Bachmann taking into consideration all your input. Thank all you guys for the great advice! :D
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,643 Posts
I do want to thank you.
You asked a simple question, which drew out the one responder is always a joy to deal with (but only after half a bottle of single-malt Scotch).

Just remember, all the stuff you read from said person, all the contrived, extrapolated bul.....err....baloney, explanations of why that are so weak they collapse before the keyboard is silent, this person is continuing to have input on product prior to release.

Remember that.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
2,062 Posts
Going back to something stated about the top speed of this locomotive being twice the prototype to satisfy the 'masses'.

If they spent all that time and money getting the details of the K-27 correct, it stands to reason that the top speed should also be correct.

For this model, the majority of the users report they run the locomotive at prototype speeds. In fact, if someone off the street bought this engine, I would imagine it would be to run it at prototype speeds pulling prototype consists. It is simply a huge locomotive. The gearbox is clearly a mistake to me. I've only seen this engine run a few times, but it was at what looked like proto speeds. But I guess in order to keep from having to replace everyone's gearboxes, they can't officially admit they made an error. Incidentally, I haven't noticed their Shays or the other geared locos running at 30 MPH, so why the change for this loco? I really hope that the new Mallet doesn't come painted for Acela, but then, the LGB Mikado was made in SP Daylight, so who knows.

My Bachmann 4-4-0 seems to run awfully fast, on the top end. However, on the bottom end, she really can creep where my Aristo locos will shudder.

Mark
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
285 Posts
Posted By gdancer on 09/01/2008 11:14 AM

snip...

, it appears that Bachmann has now solved most if not all the serious design issues. 

1) Am I correct on this? Unfortunately, I have several curves on my layout where I had to use 8' diameter track. 

2) Will the K-27 easily take 8' diameter without larger diameter transition track? Finally, I had to quit using a Bachman Annie on my Aristo stainless 4 years ago as I am convinced that some sort of electrolysis occurred between the cast drivers on the Annie and the stainless track: required serious cleanup every 10 minutes of operation to the point of serious frustration. (I had no problem with the turned steel drivers of my LGB locos.) Of course, that was just on DC, not DCC which I am presently using. 

3) Does the K-27 have power pickup thorough the drivers or through a 'shoe' a la LGB? 

4) Are the drivers of the K-27 cast rather than turned? 

5) Has anyone with stainless track experienced unusual black deposit on stainless while using the K-27? 

6) Any recommendations of DCC decoders for ease of installation on the K-27? Thanks for your input, guys!

















1) No

2) No, (define easily)

3) No shoe, sorta through the drivers.

4) I don't know what process was used, but, they are definitely not nickle plated or polished like the LGB wheels

5) I don't have stainless track, but I did notice the black "deposit" on both nickle silver and brass rail. I would suppose it will on stainless, or aluminum also. (See "Arcing Modification" below)

6) My final configuration ended up being a SFX064D and a K1 in the tender and a DG583S, TF4 and K1 in the loco.



First, some videos of the Kay in action on the ALLY...

This was it's first run.



Actually it took a dozen attempts to get that shot. The Kay kept locking up and would not start when commanded. I wanted the camera dolly loco  to be moving when the Kay started. (See "Bind Fix" below)



Here is a couple showing the different whistles I loaded into the SFX sound card.





 

Here are some of the improvements I came up with:

In no particular order:



Tender Wire Improvement

The wiring diagram that Bachmann published shows wires from each truck to the plug board.

They also show wires between the two trucks. Those wires DO NOT EXIST! Had they been there, they would shunt high currents around the lands on the plug board should the front and rear trucks happen to be on reversed polarity track. That could happen if backing through a reverse loop, or if the rear truck derails when backing through a turnout.

Unfortunately, the loco wiring does not match the drawing (in this and a few other respects)

I redrew the drawing, corrected the errors and colorized the wires to make the drawing easier to follow.



(Full size version can be downloaded HERE )



Notice that there are no wires connecting the front and rear tender trucks. If there is a derailment and the rear truck polarity is opposite the front truck, the traces that run the length of the circuit board will have to carry all the current.

If you run the Kay on a power source greater than 5 amps, and uses slow blow fuses, thermal cutouts or DCC delays longer than 500 ms, I recommend you make the following improvement.



Unsolder the red and black wires from the rear truck where they enter the board. Extend them and solder them to the same solder pads that the front truck uses.



Note: do not move the front wires to the rear to accomplish the same thing. If the entire tender is at the opposite polarity from the loco, then the current will still go through the lands of the board to the loco.





Tender Wire improvement 2



On my Kay, after a few days of testing, the loco began applying intermittent shorts to the rails on curves. I noticed sparks coming from the area of the tender trucks pivots.



It turns out the wires to the trucks go through small holes in a METAL part of the trucks. The holes are too small and have sharp edges. They wore through the track pickup wires.



Replace the wires from the tender trucks with  good quality rubber insulated test lead wire. Drill the holes in the trucks out larger and file edges smooth. Install Teflon selves where the wires pass through the trucks.





Arcing Modification



On both DC and DCC the wheels on my Kay would pit and crud up really fast. In less than an hour of running, I had to clean the drivers, trailing truck, and to a greater extent the tender wheels.

I was also noticing burn marks on the tops of both my brass and Nickle silver rails. Some might mistake these burn marks for a crud build up. In reality they seemed to me to be caused by arcing. By watching the loco at night I discovered severe sparking on only one side of the loco when running on DC. On DCC the arcing was less, but equal on both sides of the loco. By running the loco in one direction for an hour on on a freshly polished test track, I discovered the black "deposits" were only showing up on one rail, the one where I observed the sparking. I therefor theorize that these black "deposits" are related to the arcing and may be carbon deposited from the pits in the wheels. 

To find out why this loco arcs so bad, I traced the circuit boards and drew a schematic of the majority of the boards. This was weeks before Bachmann published a schematic. When the Bachmann did publish the schematic, I compared mine to theirs. This lead me to complete mine which corrects some errors on theirs, (not the least of which is that they had the + and - outputs of the bridge rectifier reversed.

As far as I can tell, this is a correct schematic. Thanks to Tony and George for their assistance.





( FULL SIZE VERSION HERE )

Notice that there are two 470 micro-farad capacitors on the output of the bridge, These act as a dead short until they are charged up and will therefor absorb the maximum instantaneous current your power source can provide. ( This can be considerably higher than the rated sustained current or the value of the fuses. )



I could not eliminate these capacitors because it would result in immediate failure of several regulator chips. Worse still, the regulator chips themselves draw their max current until the output voltage reaches the desired output voltage. 

To determine if the arcing was due to the motor itself, or the capacitors and regulators on the boards in the loco and tender, I temporarily unplugged the connector on PCB 8  and connected the loco track pickups directly to the motor. This bypassed all the circuitry.



Running the loco on DC with all the boards bypassed, the arcing was almost gone. After three hours, both rails appeared equally clean with no black carbon deposits or sign of pitting on one rail. If there was any carbon or pitting going on, the loco was wearing it back off as fast as it was depositing the carbon.



The best fix would be to rewire the filter circuit to form a twin "T" filter. However, I did not go that route because of other issues. That leaves only four other solutions, remove the boards with the capacitors and all the boards that depend on them and wire the loco for DC. Or, do a normal wired DCC decoder install. Or convert to battery/RC. Or clean the wheels and rails every hour or so. 





Tender Shell Repair.

There have been many reports that screw towers inside  the tender break. Three of the four in my tender were broken. In addition, part of the tender shell was broke out at the rear.





Apparently the factory tightened down the tender shell but did not check to see if the cutout lever was in the correct position. It was captured between the tender shell and tender floor.

This caused a big chunk of to be broken out of the shell. Fortunately, the broken part ended up inside the tender. A couple other broken parts were in the plastic bag.







The breaks were fairly clean with no deformation of the plastic. I was able to fit the part tightly back in place, then apply a drop of CA on the inside to hold it there. I then reinforced the part with Epoxy on the inside of the tender.

Because My Kay is an undecorated one, it was easy to spray primer, sand and then repaint the entire shell. The repair is invisible thanks to the hardness of the plastic Bachmann used. Had the plastic been soft, it would have deformed and the repair would have been a lot harder to hide.



The screw towers can not be glued. They are slightly shorter than needed, so when you tighten the screws they will pop again. If your screw towers are not broken, be careful not to over-tighten the screws.

Several fixes have been published. However, I opted to cut the towers in half and then shorten them by taking 1/4 inch out of the center, I then rejoined the two halves with a short piece of surgical tubing. I epoxied the lower halves. This provided a spring loaded hold down of the tender shell when the screws are tightened, which stretches the tubing.





Smoke Improvement



The smoke element runs at 12 volts. I have not had mine burn out yet. However, the 12 volt regulator did quit after an hour or so. I by-passed it with a 12 volt regulator and heat sink from Radio Shack. I drove the regulator directly from the yellow lead of the decoder which I remapped for the smoke unit. I also set a qualifier so the smoke would be on when moving to conserve fluid when I parked the train.



When the smoke is on, no smoke will come out of the stack. When I looked down into the stack , I could see that the element was smoking, but all the smoke was being sucked down inside the loco.



To get the smoke to come out the stack, remove the four screws holding the fan in place. Discard the two longer screws. Flip the fan over and re-install the two shorter screws.





With the fan blowing upward, this is what it looks like.



Improving lighting effects.



Despite assurances that the fancy current regulator would not interfere with FX effects like firebox flicker, they did. There is no way to get the two phase flicker effect included with Digitrax and SoundTraxx decoders to work through the Bachmann circuits. I bypassed them by wiring them through 1 meg 1/8 watt resistors to the decoders.



If you want the headlight to brighten and dim properly in sync with the generator sound on a Tsunami sound card. you will have to bypass the regulator circuit. I replace the Bachmann LED with a 5 volt bulb. The regulator will not provide enough current for a bulb, so I used a 270 Ohm 1/4 watt resistor and drove the bulb from a K1 function decoder mounted on the back side of the boiler front..



I did not like the orange LED in the front markers. I used three bulbs per marker, red, yellow and green, and wired the front markers to a Digitrax K1 decoder so I could operate the Kay in sections or as specials.

I did the same thing for the tender, as seen here:











Improving Sluggish Operation.



I have no issues with the high top end speed. I normally try to find out what the prototype typical speed is, and set the decoder vMax to that speed. This provides a full 126 speed steps over the entire speed range for more accurate control.

However, a low gear ratio, (one that makes the loco run too fast) also sacrifices pulling power and smooth low speed performance. 



As a typical train for the Kay, I decided that I liked the looks of one 1:20 Bachmann box car, 12 LGB logging disconnect pairs and a caboose. 



This would be typical of the length and weight of a train I would pull with the Kay on the ALLY. It is not so long that it can pass it's tail, and there are places where the entire train can bee seen. Yes, Ideal train length is purely subjective and largely a matter of personal preference.



Before setting up back EMF, I always run the train with BEMF off. It is always best to get the loco running smooth prior to setting up BEMF.

I noticed that this train lugged down the Kay in the curves. I pulled the same train with a LGB Forney  Also with BEMF off) for comparison and there was no drastic slowing in the curves. (I have no grades)

After looking at several possibilities I finally discovered that with the decoder removed, the voltage at the motor under moderate load was 2-1/2 to 3 volts lower than the voltage on the tracks. So somewhere in the loco wiring the Kay was dropping a lot of voltage as the amps went up.



OK, Let's trace the current as it flows from the left front driver through the motor and out the front right driver.



right front driver

pickup brush

front brush board

red jumper wire

through printed circuit board (PCB) 07

red jumper wire

through PCB 05

8 pin connector

ribbon cable

through main loco circuit board

red wire to tender

7 pin connector

through PCB 09

red jumper wire

through PCB 01

the DCC socket Track R

PCB04 or decoder

the DCC socket Motor +

through PCB 01

orange jumper

through PCB O9

7 pin plug

orange tender jumper

through main loco circuit board

ribbon cable

8 pin cable

through PCB 05

red wire to motor

black wire from motor

through PCB 05

8 pin connector

ribbon cable

main loco circuit board

gray jumper to tender

6 pin connector

through PCB10

gray jumper wire

PCB 01

DCC socket Motor -

through PCB 04 or decoder

DCC socket 

through PCB 01

black jumper

through PCB 10

6 pin plug

black tender cable

through main loco circuit board

ribbon cable

8 pin plug

through PCB05

black jumper wire

through PCB 07

black jumper wire

front pickup board

brush

front left driver

 

Try to count how many solder joints.

Try to count how many mechanical contacts ( don't forget the four on the direction switch, which I didn't list).

Just how many time does it have to go through a circuit board?

I estimated over 9 feet of thin stiff brittle wire.



OK, so I figured I'm losing three volts somewhere, but where?

The problem is, the more resistance, the less able the motor will be able to maintain speed. The problem is worse because the motor has to run too slow due to the gear ratio. I could either change the ratio, or reduce the resistance.

As an experiment, I disconnected the ribbon cable from PCB 05. Then I jumped the red and black from the loco pickup to the red and black motor leads. Now the wiring is reduced to 6 inches and all plugs are eliminated. I ran the Kay again. Pulling the same box car, 12 disconnects and caboose, the loco breezed through the curves without slowing down.



To prevent the Kay fr lugging down, eliminate as much wiring and as many connectors as you can.





Installing a decoder.



I tried 6 different motor decoders, (three different brands) using the socket. I tried 7 different sound decoders, (three different brands)

I tried all of the tricks published on the Bachmann site to get them to work. I tried little transistors, big transistors, three transistors.

I followed all the Bachmann web site instructions.



Did they work? Well some people might say so. In most cases the Kay would run, sort of. In many cases the chuff would work, if you weren't very particular.

I wasn't satisfied. The Kay did not run or sound like a model should. Certainly not nearly as well as my stock LGB Mikado.

Along the way, I hooked up a scope and really experimented with the chuff. I discovered that a 1 k resistor from rail A to + out worked just as good as any of the transistor "fixes". I also found out that a Phoenix 2K2, a SoundTraxx and even the three different Digitrax SFX cards would chuff perfectly using the optical chuff, if they had a battery, and a battery for the optical circuit. But, only if you connect the rail inputs of the sound cards to the + and - outputs of the dummy card INSTEAD OF THE RAIL PICKUPS.

Of course if all you want is perfect chuff's, that is great. but the sound card always thinks the loco is going forward, so the whistles, uncouple and some other features are messed up. That was about the closest I came to a perfect sound installation using the optical chuff.

I had to stop and evaluate the situation.

I really wanted to use a standard DCC interface. It would be easy to try new decoders. Easy to swap sound cards on a whim.

But, I had already bypassed the flicker circuit to get an acceptable flicker. I bypassed  the headlight, to get a generator effect, the markers to get rid of the LED, the smoke because it burned out, the capacitors were causing arching issues, the rats net of wires were causing performance e and reliability issues, and all the handling had introduced a couple connector failures and broken wires.



I removed everything.



Here is what I installed:

 I positioned a DG583S in the loco with the connector next to the motor. I re-wired the pickup boards and trailing axle to the track inputs. I connected the existing motor leads directly to the decoder. Total wire length from driver to driver through the motor, 10 inches.

I connected a two conductor cable with a plug on it to the decoder track terminals. This carried DCC up into the loco and provided a plug to make it easy to disconnect the boiler. I mounted a K1 to the back of the boiler for the six bulbs in the markers and the headlight. 

I mounted another K1 on the blackhead for firebox flicker and cab light.

I connected the smoke unit to the F0F screw terminal and common on the motor decoder. The fan is powered by the F0R screw terminal and set to turn off when the loco stops to reduce noise when the loco is standing..

In the tender, I installed two 4 ohm speakers in series, a Digitrax sound bug and a K1 on the rear tender wall for the six bulbs in the lanterns. My Kay came without a backup light, so I installed an LGB headlight which I connected to the K1. 

Why did I use the sound Bug? Well It cost less than $50.00. Go back and listen to the videos, was it worth it?

For the chuff, I installed two reed switches in the cylinders and glued magnets to the optical flags. I wired the switches to the draw-bar and the draw-bar pin in the tender to the Sound-Bug. 

Why separate decoders? Simple, I now have a two wire track/data buss going to all the major components of the Kay with a two pin plug in each wire. Disassembly and maintenance is a snap. Fewer wires equals fewer failure points. Total cost of all the decoders was about 120 dollars street price. If I want to upgrade the sound, motor a function decoder in the future, I don't have to replace a big expensive multi-purpose decoder and do extensive rewiring. I can pick and choose features to "build" a decoder that does everything without sacrificing some feature just because the super decoder does not have it. Some will point out that a separate sound decoder can not be aware of the load on the motor. To that, I'll just say that those people do not understand just what decoder feedback is all about. Both the sound card and the motor decoder have Transponding, a Digitrax decoder feedback technology.



All wires between the loco and tender are totally eliminated with only the chuff input going through the draw-bar. I did not feel the need to feed the pickups in the tender to the loco. They both are heavy enough to work on the ALLY. The tender pickup is probably not as good as the loco pickup so eventually I may get sound dropouts. If that happens I can add a super cap to the sound, jumper the loco to the tender, or change out the Bachmann axles with LGB BB axles with electrical pickups.



Bind Fix



There was a lot said about the Kay locking up due to the loose eccentrics. The drive rods get out of wack and the Kay won't move.



Mine did it from the very start.

I also noticed that the front left wheel had a slight wobble.



TOC published a fix for the loose eccentrics, which I immediately applied.(shims and shortening the shafts a little.)

The lockups obviously caused by the eccentrics went away, but, the loco still galloped. It would seem to bind one per revolution.

I waited for my replacement eccentrics.

They came in, I put them on. they were tighter than the originals, but still a little loose and so the sidrods did some funny jumpy things..

I still had the galloping.

I could not get shims in the smaller space of the flat spots, so I took off the new eccentrics and put the old ones on and the shims back in.

I still had the galloping. and once in a while, the loco locked up when changing direction.

This time I noticed that the third right hand driver had a wobble.

I knew I had not moved the front wheel to the third position, so I removed the CW. and found... A BENT SCREW.

Well DUH! I should have wondered why one screw was always harder to tighten.

The loco still locks once in a great while.

If I am not pulling cars, it is OK

If I stop suddenly while backing, and the cars coast and create slack, it is OK.

If I slow very gradually, backing, and keep a small amount of resistance against the rear coupler. It locks UP.

I took out and disassembled the motor and gear box.

Found nothing.

I ran the loco on rollers for 24 hours. 10 seconds forward, 10 seconds backward (DCC and a program on my desktop)

The problem seemed to go away. still, every once in a while, It won't budge going forward after a smooth gentle stop when backing a string of cars. When that happens, the only way to get it to move, is to throw it in reverse, back up slightly and then go forward. When it is locked, all the junk on the sides are free of binds, only the geared driver is tight.



I was told the loco would take five foot curves.

It will.

It will navigate my R3 turnouts at each end of the passenger sidings.



The only problem is, the loco AND TENDER WON'T. 

It throws the tender off the tracks at both ends of both sidings. I looked at possible modifications, but decided they weren't worth the effort. and would make the loco look bad. 

Sure is a nice looking loco.

I canceled my order for a second Kay. Bought another Forney with factory DCC and sound (for about the same price) 

I found a shelf in my den where I can admire how great the Kay would have looked on the ALLY.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,643 Posts
Bob- Thanks.
Glad to see you were able to get a long post up.

Stanley-

Now what are you going to do?
Call Clambake and get Bob fired?
Gee, can't do that.

Complain to Howard Lee and get him pitched?
Gee, can't do that.

Get someone on the East Coast to ignore the polish on his shoes long enough to demand a re-review?
Gee,can't do that.

Tell everybody Bob doesn't like DCC and is picking on someone's choice of control systems?
Gee, can't do that.

Stanley, you stuck your nose in where it didn't belong, utilizing skills you didn't have, and you alone stand responsible.
Now you're involved with the Liver Spot, and God alone knows what you've done there.

Thank Heavens you were successful in getting me pitched.

I feel no strong urges to sort out your mess this time.

And, please, stop with the e-mails and phone calls.
They will NOT be answered.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
2,266 Posts
Bob,
Yikes! No one can say you didn't give it the "Good 'ol college try!!" Too bad all that hard work didn't pay off in the end. Funny, I always thought that a locomotive should run correctly out of the box and not need someone with an electrical engineering degree to make it work. As I understand it, the optical chuff doesn't work with most sound systems without modification. Now how did that come about? I've heard rumors that the circuits are reversed in some instances.... If this is indeed the case why wasn't it caught before the K was sent out to the public?
I also heard a rumor that the gear ratio problem was actually NOT a problem.....until they changed from a double head worm gear to a single head and they didn't halve the gearing (or something to that effect.) Again, it sure sounds as if there was a screw up and somebody is desperately trying to cover it up.....
 

· Registered
Joined
·
354 Posts
Bob

Thanks for the most informative post. It will take some time to get to the bottom of all of your observations. Some are likely limitations of the model and your observations will hopefully lead to improvements. Some of what you report may be a result of a damaged locomotive or a result of the modifications you made. All manufacturers have a feature set they provide in their models. As modelers we often modify them to try to improve upon them but it is often a mistake to blame the manufacture when we are unsuccessful with those modifications.

I am on my way to Portland so I am unable to take apart one of my Ks to try to recreate some of your observations until I return. Some of what you report however can easily be addressed.

Lets take them one at a time.


It will navigate my R3 turnouts at each end of the passenger sidings.

The only problem is, the loco AND TENDER WON'T.

It throws the tender off the tracks at both ends of both sidings. I looked at possible modifications, but decided they weren't worth the effort. and would make the loco look bad.



Just so we are on the same page by R3 you mean the 1600 line of turnouts. As many have reported (even in this thread) the locomotive and tender work just fine on these turnouts. If you like I can post a video of the K27 (and tender) going through a pair at full speed. I made this video while experimenting with Daves axle locking procedure.

So why then do you have problems while others do not. I think I may have a clue. When I first got a K27 of my own, the first thing I did was take it apart so I could fully understand it from the perspective of the additions I chose to make. When I reassembled it the first time my locomotive and tender could no longer navigate 1600 turnouts. Most times the tender derailed. After a lot of head scratching I found the reason was that I had inadvertently shortened the wires to the tender and when the locomotive entered the 1600 curve it literally picked the tender wheels off the track. The problem went away when I went back and lengthened the wires. Perhaps you inadvertently did the same thing.


There have been many reports that screw towers inside the tender break. Three of the four in my tender were broken. In addition, part of the tender shell was broke out at the rear.



When you first got the K, I seem to remember you reported a greatly damaged outer box that occurred during shipping. I would never accept a clearly damaged model. All manufacturers will try to improve things when problems occur but some things are out of their control. The back of the tender does not get a hole in like yours had without some real extreme pressure. In your case a shipment that clearly had gone through the wringer and had a broken tender inside should in my opinion been immediately returned.


This time I noticed that the third right hand driver had a wobble.

I knew I had not moved the front wheel to the third position, so I removed the CW. and found... A BENT SCREW.

The problem seemed to go away. still, every once in a while, It won't budge going forward after a smooth gentle stop when backing a string of cars. When that happens, the only way to get it to move, is to throw it in reverse, back up slightly and then go forward. When it is locked, all the junk on the sides are free of binds, only the geared driver is tight.


I mentioned the shipping damage because I know of no one else who has these performance problems. True with the loose counterweights many had binding problems, especially on rollers, but to the best of my knowledge no one else has had these binding problems or bent screw problems once the proper counterweights were installed. I can not help you with this one. In my opinion, either something got real damaged in shipment, you put it back together wrong, or something has been damaged in some other fashion. All 3 of my K-27s have the replacement counterweights (one set I did the others had been done already) and none have any binding problems. Perhaps someone else can help you with this one.


To get the smoke to come out the stack, remove the four screws holding the fan in place. Discard the two longer screws. Flip the fan over and re-install the two shorter screws.


Yep you are credited at finding this one. A fan that blows air into the locomotive is sure going to dampen the smoke output.


Despite assurances that the fancy current regulator would not interfere with FX effects like firebox flicker, they did. There is no way to get the two phase flicker effect included with Digitrax and SoundTraxx decoders to work through the Bachmann circuits.


Bachmann uses a single wire to control its firebox flicker. To get the effects you desired you need two independent wires to control the flicker. There is nothing wrong with wanting to add more features to a model than is provided off the shelf. Many of us do this type of enhancement to a model. (I especially like the three LED effect on the classification lights) I doubt that you will ever get all your desired effects in a production locomotive


If you want the headlight to brighten and dim properly in sync with the generator sound on a Tsunami sound card. you will have to bypass the regulator circuit

I have not tried the Tsunami effects but all the other brands tested the effects work just fine with no mods. For example the ESU decoder also has a similar lighting generator effect and it works perfectly out of the box with the K-27. Current regulation is usually ideal for LED effects. When I return I will try to get with Soundtraxx and figure out why you had the problem. In Phoenix Soundtraxx was demonstrating the Tsumani with the Airwore RC inside the K27 and I thought they showed the lighting effects working properly but I may be mistaken on this so will check it out.

Those are the easy issues you raised

Now lets get to the harder ones.


I noticed that this train lugged down the Kay in the curves.


An interesting set of observations. I will have to try to recreate your cause and effect. I chose a different set of decoders for my installations and have absolutely no lugging or lack of power in or out of curves. My slow speed performance is exceptional and my Ks will pull much longer trains than you report up the long 2% and 3% grades on my railroad. I can set the locomotive at speed step one and it will tie crawl over the entire layout for hours with no change in speed or ability to pull. 12 volt versions of the same Pitmann motors are used in brass O scale and one of the brass builders has used them for year. He also has reported that not all decoders control these motors well. It is the high efficiency aspect of these motors that can confuse the back emf detection on most of the earlier decoders and many of the decoders produced today. For many years these motors have been the gold standard for achieving good performance which few have met. I will have to talk to him about his observations with the decoders you chose but based on the magazine decoder reviews performed in Europe, I suspect this one of the the real root causes of the problem you have reported.


I was also noticing burn marks on the tops of both my brass and Nickle silver rails. Some might mistake these burn marks for a crud build up. In reality they seemed to me to be caused by arcing. By watching the loco at night I discovered severe sparking on only one side of the loco when running on DC. On DCC the arcing was less, but equal on both sides of the loco. By running the loco in one direction for an hour on on a freshly polished test track, I discovered the black "deposits" were only showing up on one rail, the one where I observed the sparking. I therefor theorize that these black "deposits" are related to the arcing and may be carbon deposited from the pits in the wheels.


It has been a long time since I have run on DC but I will try to recreate your observation when I return. On DCC with the installs I did I have not observed the problem you report and on one locomotive I am charging batteries as well as operating the motor and effects. As we discussed in the past the capacitors on the +- leads can cause problems with some decoders. In particular manufacturer of the decoder you chose specifically cut the ground wire on their production decoders because they did not want this connection made. This issue interests me so I will look more into it when I have some time. Perhaps there is a design principle that needs to be explored for specifying internal locomotive wiring that needs to be explored here.

All for now

Stan Ames
http://www.tttrains.com/largescale
 

· Registered
Joined
·
354 Posts
Stanley, you stuck your nose in where it didn't belong, utilizing skills you didn't have, and you alone stand responsible.
Now you're involved with the Liver Spot, and God alone knows what you've done there.


Dave

The above is a well written expression of your feelings. It is very unfortunate that you self destructed on the internet earlier this year and no I did not do any of the things you claim I did to you, you did it to yourself.

In the past you have been a great asset to the hobby. Most of us here have used your procedures to improve on those model you choose to do this on or used your procedures as a starting point to develop our own set if improvements.

Bachmann industries took a great risk in developing what is perhaps the most advanced 1:20.3 mass produced model ever produced. Many of us in the community had pleaded for years for Bachmann to produce a large locomotive. And many of us clearly hope that they will produce another such model for a different prototype in the future. Most of us who have this model really enjoy it and to many of us it is our favorite locomotive.

We had many discussions and many attempts were made to get you involved. You simply can not continuously insult everyone; try to scare everyone with fictional door number two, DCC for all, etc; break confidences continuously; and expect people to share things with you.

Unfortunately since the first pre production locomotive first ran on my layout last year as part of the NNGC, you have continuously blasted me, many Bachmann employees, their products and just about anyone who tries to post anything positive.

I truly hope that in the future there is a way to work together for the better of the hobby which is why I invited you to sit down in Portland next week and try to work things out. I am going to be in your neighborhood as an attendee and Bachmann will be there as an exhibitor. Its not often that such an opportunity presents itself.

You have worked hard to get a very loyal and vocal customer base who will follow you anywhere. Lets hope the community can find a way to harness this energy in a positive fashion for the good of the large scale community.

Stan Ames
http://www.tttrains.com/largescale
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
404 Posts
"Lets hope the community can find a way to harness this energy ..."

I'm figuring that "this energy" will be best used to power up the BS sifter...

* Is the K27 geared wrong? Yes or No...
* Do all of its functions perform properly on DC or battery power right out of the box? Yes or No...
* Are there "work-arounds" required to achieve the intended/advertised/desired performance of the K27 before it hits the rails? Yes or No...
* Are there any aspects of TOC's evaluations or discoveries blatantly incorrect or non-factual? Yes or No...

I see two sides to this conundrum.

One side is represented by someone who has a direct interest in the public's acceptance of a toy train that potenially has "issues" in its original configuration for distribution.

The other does not...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,643 Posts
I did not self destruct.
If that's your view, stuff it.
I will let you figure out where.
I put in 11-1/2 years fighting prima-donnas, and I certainly don't need any more.
Fighting or prima-donnas.
You wormed your way into the Pholks at Philly, and look what we've got.
Read Bob's post, if you want a dcc version of the issues.
Obviously, since I use a system different than dcc, I am not qualified to evaluate the units, nor write reviews.
I cannot wait to see how your influence has affected the next loco out of the shed.
Self-destructed?
Boy.
You don't understand mechanics, nor electronics, and you certainly do not understand what was happening.
Personally, I have determined that as long as you are involved with this company, and that includes making statements for them, I will not purchase anything from them.
That's my opinion.
I have no intention of encouraging anyone else, publicly or privately, to either purchase or not purchase products from said company.
That said, look at the comments from folks waiting for the "next run" of K's.
While Marketing and the ecconomy may have something to do with sales, when even staunch dcc-users come out with huge posts on "issues", you become a lone voice (added to your particular shill following), and we all wonder if the consumer isn't looking at all the comments from actual owners before deciding to buy or not.
Remember the counterweights.
While I am trying my darndest to get them to look at the issue and allow publishing of a field fix, all I am hearing is "Stanley says there is no problem".
That is, until you had an engineer look at it and confirm what you had fought against.
I have other things to do now that do NOT include the company in question.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
187 Posts
"Many of us in the community had pleaded for years for Bachmann to produce a large locomotive."

Yes, many of us did... and when they agreed, you came riding in, pushed Goodson out of the way, and flat out managed to F'up what otherwise would have been a great engine and a home run for Bachmann! If I were China - I'd be suing your ass off Stan!! If I was H. Lee Riley I'd be disavowing as loud as possible having ever even known you!

Wanna know a little secret? Let me fill you in... (Hey Bud, are you watching this? H. Lee? Ray? Doug? Let's make sure EVERYONE is paying attention here... because this is VERY, VERY important. Mr. Kenneth Ting Woo-shou, sir - I hope you are reading this... as I also hope you are as well Mr. Ivan Ting Tien-li. In fact, it's been said that Bachmann folks monitor all of the Internet forums when it comes to poor reviews and postings about their products... so here goes...)

I own one K-27. Onboard the Queen Mary, when the K-27 was announced, I stood at the Bachmann booth and said I would buy THREE of them.

The reason I own only one K-27 is simple. It is because of Mr. Stanley Ames Jr.'s involvement with the development of the locomotive.

Not the cost. Not the economy. Not availability.

No, the reason I have yet to purchase a second and third engine is that I, like many people, am waiting for the second, "corrected" run of K-27s to be produced.

You see gentleman, you have a MARKETING problem. I hate the "super socket" - I hate having to pay for it, I hate the confines it has backed me into, I hate that I had to PAY MORE after buying the engine to "work around" it. So imagine my relief when Ray Buteux began telling folks that a second, updated run of K-27's would be coming 2008/2009. No more INCORRECT red marker lights. (and Stand, I'm going to go ahead and preempt your B.S. about "running backwards" - don't even try that crap here)... Screw terminals for RC use... Corrected Fan... oh... and of course that oh-so-little-teeny-tiny little problem of BROKEN COUNTER WEIGHTS THAT PREVENT THE ENGINE FROM MOVING...

All of the things that said to me (and to MANY other people) "Wait! Don't buy anymore engines from the first, maligned, run - wait for the next run!"


So you see gentleman, the first mistake was allowing your "consultant" to mess with what could have been... what SHOULD have been the greatest single engine to have ever been produced in 1:20.3. The engine that all of us had cried and begged for...

Gentleman - your sales are not suffering due to the economy, or miscalculation on market share... no. Your sales are suffering because we are all waiting for the second generation of engines that no longer suffer the scars of forced DCC integration, loud as a jet engine cooling fan, cross your fingers that the drivers don't lockup, fast as a bat out of ****, and for the sake of all that is holy, don't look directly into the lights: they're as gaudy as a ten dollar whore's Christmas tree, consulting!

Mr. Ting Woo-shou, I like your products sir, and I want... I really, really want to buy more of them and the best way you can get me to do so is to FIRE Stanley Ames Jr. Don't for one second longer allow him to continue to alienate and drive away customers like myself by advising you on product development he knows nothing about.

And - again in the interest of a preemptive strike - if Mr. Ames cannot be "fired" if, as he claims, he is not an employee (though Bachmann people keep saying he is - ****, Mr. Riley boasted that fact to many in Arizona) then sir, I highly encourage you to FIRE H. Lee Riley, the man who brags at train shows he's "hired" Mr. Ames.
 
41 - 60 of 115 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top