I got my new Accucraft Mogul last week - the NGNC#2 ... Frankly, some mixed feelings at the moment... Not very well packed (in spite of the steel cradle - the diamond stack is too tall for the cradle which means you can't roll the engine out of it) and there was some damage to the smokebox shell. It had slipped out forward about 1/4", gouging the paint. I had to tap it back in. One of the mounting screws that holds the lamp on was loose and wouldn't tighten. Since AC doesn't provide an exploded parts diagram I don't know what the screw attaches to or how to disassemble it fix that) - a nut behind, between wrapper and the smoke box, I think.
The pilot braces and sand "tubes" are poorly and cheaply done, for a $1500 loco. The right pilot brace won't stay in, even with some work on the bending - they will have to be re-engineered. The sand tubes look like an afterthought - just some stainless wire clipped with diagonal cutters (ends unfinished) and crudely bent to fit the driver space. Sloppy varnish work on the sand tubes as well. Nut driver wrench supplied is different from the one supplied for the Ruby and doesn't fit the bolts its designed for - too small (its not the small one like you get with the Ruby.) The Ruby version worked fine.
First track run was not good (ran the engine on rollers for a bit first). While it easily handles 8 foot curves, its very sensitive to vertical issues with the track - especially the rear drivers - would not loop the circuit without derailing the rear drivers (they would jump consistently to the left at some points) - the only loco out of 12 that I have that won't. I had to take the tender off eventually or risk destroying it in the derails. Will have to see in the spring what can be done with the track. Its very top heavy, which doesn't help. Some of the detail features in the wheel carriage (brake bars etc) could be made of more substantial brass or steel to give some weight down low.
So far, its Ruby 1, Mogul 0... Mogul sure is a pig on gas, but it was a cold day too. Compensated drivers would help too (especially on the rear pair). Jury's still out on the Mogul. A shay may run better on my line (my Bachmann shay runs well, as does the Connie)
Some might recall my rant about the Ruby deal, which I had Dwight delete - followed up with Ridge Road on that - they said that they have to order the cars with the Ruby - told them I bought the Ruby as in stock from them at the time of the deal at xmas time. They went back to AC, apparently AC said too bad Ridge Road had Ruby in stock, no cars for you. NOT impressed.
Based on the Mogul, I wouldn't look twice at the C19, and the 4-4-0 only because the driver spacing might work out better. In the low end ACs, the Ruby is the better deal, and in my view, better made and finished (agreed -simpler, so easier to be "better")
Hopefully after I can get at the track in the spring, I can tame the Mogul.
On a more upbeat note, my second USAT GP9 in TH&B livery came, so I now have 401 and 402 as a running pair (which they did in real life). USAT labelled them as GP7s which they weren't, though. USAT did #70 and 71 as well, which were the 7s, without the dynamic brakes or air tubes on top (the 9s are TT) I'll put a couple of pictures up of them on the weekend.
The pilot braces and sand "tubes" are poorly and cheaply done, for a $1500 loco. The right pilot brace won't stay in, even with some work on the bending - they will have to be re-engineered. The sand tubes look like an afterthought - just some stainless wire clipped with diagonal cutters (ends unfinished) and crudely bent to fit the driver space. Sloppy varnish work on the sand tubes as well. Nut driver wrench supplied is different from the one supplied for the Ruby and doesn't fit the bolts its designed for - too small (its not the small one like you get with the Ruby.) The Ruby version worked fine.
First track run was not good (ran the engine on rollers for a bit first). While it easily handles 8 foot curves, its very sensitive to vertical issues with the track - especially the rear drivers - would not loop the circuit without derailing the rear drivers (they would jump consistently to the left at some points) - the only loco out of 12 that I have that won't. I had to take the tender off eventually or risk destroying it in the derails. Will have to see in the spring what can be done with the track. Its very top heavy, which doesn't help. Some of the detail features in the wheel carriage (brake bars etc) could be made of more substantial brass or steel to give some weight down low.
So far, its Ruby 1, Mogul 0... Mogul sure is a pig on gas, but it was a cold day too. Compensated drivers would help too (especially on the rear pair). Jury's still out on the Mogul. A shay may run better on my line (my Bachmann shay runs well, as does the Connie)
Some might recall my rant about the Ruby deal, which I had Dwight delete - followed up with Ridge Road on that - they said that they have to order the cars with the Ruby - told them I bought the Ruby as in stock from them at the time of the deal at xmas time. They went back to AC, apparently AC said too bad Ridge Road had Ruby in stock, no cars for you. NOT impressed.
Based on the Mogul, I wouldn't look twice at the C19, and the 4-4-0 only because the driver spacing might work out better. In the low end ACs, the Ruby is the better deal, and in my view, better made and finished (agreed -simpler, so easier to be "better")
Hopefully after I can get at the track in the spring, I can tame the Mogul.
On a more upbeat note, my second USAT GP9 in TH&B livery came, so I now have 401 and 402 as a running pair (which they did in real life). USAT labelled them as GP7s which they weren't, though. USAT did #70 and 71 as well, which were the 7s, without the dynamic brakes or air tubes on top (the 9s are TT) I'll put a couple of pictures up of them on the weekend.