G Scale Model Train Forum banner
1 - 7 of 7 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
3,134 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I'm looking for a cheap way to do yard which will be use to store cars. I've been considering using wooden "rails" or usng aluminim bar stock or bending old R! curves straight with the Train Li track bender. While I'm considering my options, I'm wondering--who makes code 332 aluminum rail? It might be the best combination of cost/ease of installation, but it's hard to find
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
161 Posts
I use aluminum rail, code 332 which I purchase from California & Oregon Coast Railway (http://www.cocry.com/)...though I believe that is a micro engineering product. If this is a storage/fiddle yard, I'd encourage you to be creative as even aluminum rail will be an expense for any considerable size. In my train storage cabinets I went from sectional track cut to fit to aluminum rail spiked to the shelves to wooden rails made from quarter round molding to two grooves cut into the shelves. For any additional storage I construct, I will be using the method that Ray Heckman devised in the Feb. 2008 Garden Railways (page 52) where rather than rails, a flat (1/8" - 1/4" thick) strip of wood or other material who's width is slightly less than the back to back wheel spacing (1 5/8" is cited) is used to guide the cars. For a drive in storage yard, I can conceive that you could transition from "regular" track to wooden rails that tapered down to the shelf/substrate guiding the cars onto such a storage mechanism.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
161 Posts
*just FYI, in listing the various types of rails I used in my storage cabinets I was trying to show an evolution toward simpler, less costly methods of guiding the rolling stock as each subsequent cabinet was built...not a transition between those types within a single cabinet!!  /DesktopModules/NTForums/themes/mls/emoticons/tongue.gif LOL
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top