G Scale Model Train Forum banner
21 - 40 of 81 Posts
Folks;

I'd like to add some information regarding the "hammer blow" (dynamic augment). People seem to think that it had a negative effect on the rail.

Back in 1981/82, as the technical writer for the NW Computer Services Department, I was assigned the task of creating a data collection procedures manual for NW's Plasser track geometry car. I had to work closely with the systems analyst on this project and also make several trips on the track geometry car itself. The problem at the time was that the relatively new 100 ton capacity coal hoppers were beating up the track, which was mostly 132 pound to the yard rail.

When the data got analyzed, an interesting result appeared. Track that was put down during the steam era was resisting the onslaught of the 100 ton hoppers. The analysts decided that the dynamic augment from all those Ys, Js, As, and Ks had acted like a blacksmith tempering a piece of iron or steel. The rail head was "work hardened" and could survive the pounding from the 100 ton hopper cars. Of course, N&W steam locomotives were very well balanced, and perhaps that helped. But dynamic augment is not necessarily a negative effect.

Now back to the regular thread,
David Meashey
 
Discussion starter · #28 ·
the virginian didnt want to let union pacific have all the great ideas, so they invented door-to-door service:D
Image


dave, that may work with wooden ties, but concrete is a whole different story(i think concrete ties are the ugliest and worst thing:mad: ),
 
Actually straight track isn't really great for high speeds because the wheels tend to oscillate from one flange to another on, straight track taking up the side play between the gauge and the flanges. This creates a long sinusoidal movement between the left flange and the right one over a distance, I don't know the exact English term for this in French it's "mouvement de lacet". It ends up deforming the track.

Actually Linwood Moody claimed that some SR&RL engines used to clip along at 60 Mph, pretty good for two foot gauge!

Reg is right the Milwaukee had some of the best steam runs ever just before WW2. His explanation for why the railroads in the US didn't advertise their speed exploits is very interesting. I had never understood why the Pennsy didn't exploit the obviously frequent runs at high speeds performed by the T1. Now I am beginning to understand why.

Actually the problems linked with high speeds were most often not what we think they are (IE: the track) more like the signaling system and the block length, the system for setting off the RR crossing gates, and most of all the breaking system for the trains. One T1 fireman said that once when they were trying to make up the schedule they went so fast that they passed the crossing gates before they closed, it freaked them out.
 
Re: attaching an engine to a TGV.
There is a documented and you-tubed incident where Blue Peter, an A2, was allowed to spin its drivers on wet rail until the valve gear disintegrated. They reckoned it was spinning at the equivalent of 165 mph.
So Acela - maybe. TGV -no.
 
Peter T
And the driver should have been executed on the spot for both incompetence and iron "horse" abuse. As I recall he was a BR employee with not a great deal of steam experience.
 
Peter T
And the driver should have been executed on the spot for both incompetence and iron "horse" abuse. As I recall he was a BR employee with not a great deal of steam experience.
It was not entirely his fault. The throttle/reverser design played also a role. The engineer was also severely injured while trying to stop the beast.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1f8_1387134457
About the world record for steam locos:
The Germans attained the record in 1936 at 200.4km/h (124.5mph). Of course the Brits had to top that and ran the Mallard at 125.88 mph,returning the world record to England. However this was achieved on a downhill grade and after the run the Mallard was damaged.
Regards
 
It was not entirely his fault. The throttle/reverser design played also a role.
Sorry Henner, but reading that link shows that it was entirely his fault.
Okay, perhaps the fact that he did not know the locomotive helped.
As far as I know, that class of loco never seemed to have any problems when in regular service.
And what does "When the driver attempted to wind the reversing gear back into mid-position to halt the slip, the force of the boiler spun it into full-forward position," mean?
They didn't have power reversers, so why couldn't he get it to mid position.
All very sad really, as all it needs is for ONLY trained crews to run preserved locos.
All the best,
David Leech, Delta, Canada
 
I read that the crew overfilled it with water which caused the regulator to prime. That initiated a series of mishaps afterwards for the driver who was unfamiliar with that particular locomotive along with the speculation of him not wanting to stall the locomotive up a grade.
I don't quite understand how a screw could be driven in reverse by the boiler either but I'm not so familiar with all the big stuff.

Andrew
 
Discussion starter · #39 ·
i aslo read that ALL running gear components/fixtures had to be rebuilt or replaced. all of the drivers needed new tires pressed on, and one or two drivers had to be replaced(new ones were cast). i once saw an old film and i think it was at the worlds fair years ago where the rails were purposely greased and a dreyfuss hudson was allowed to spin in place

jim, an execution wont teach him a lesson, but having both arms broken will!:eek:



i find it kinda funny how far this thread has wanderd:p
 
Discussion starter · #40 ·
On her home track or host's track? ;)

Andrew
i wouldnt trust leting our beloved J out of our sight. maybe somewhere on the northeast corridor.. no , we learned that the hard way with that dealdy crash..maybe on some old PRR trackage? that what the t-1's ran on..

or better yet, the D&SNG high line:D:p
 
21 - 40 of 81 Posts